![]() ![]() Technical reasons aside, there are arguments to justify that all macFUSE volumes are, in fact, "remote". Moreover, Disk Arbitration also gets involved in mounting and unmounting "local" volumes - this may be undesirable in some cases. This would have been fine if the entire file system lived in the kernel, but in macFUSE's case, the user space file system program would also want to (exclusively) open the disk device. This happens before control passes to macFUSE and mounting can proceed. In doing so, the kernel would make sure that the device is not currently in use (for one, to disallow multiple mounts of the same device). Itself open the device node and pass it to macFUSE. Such a real disk device node in macFUSE's case is problematic: at mount time, for a local volume, the kernel would It supports Intel and Apple Silicon Macs. The macFUSE software package is compatible with macOS 10.9 and later versions. (Some of its code is based on the FreeBSD implementation of FUSE.) The user-space library ( libfuse), which provides the developer-visible FUSE API, has numerous OS X specific extensions and features. The in-kernel file system is specific to OS X and is not based on Linux FUSE. MacFUSE has two major components: an in-kernel loadable file system and a user-space library ( libfuse). Another crude way to look at this would be to think of macFUSE as something that makes OS X work like a microkernel for the purpose of writing/running file systems. You can think of it as a library for easily developing OS X file systems. MacFUSE is software that allows you to write arbitrary file systems as user space applications. What is macFUSE? Is it the same as FUSE on Linux? If the question you have is not answered here, try posting it to the ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |